人民卫生出版社系列期刊
ISSN 2096-2738 CN 11-9370/R

中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
中国科学引文数据库(CSCD)来源期刊
《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊
美国化学文摘社(CAS)数据库收录期刊
日本科学技术振兴机构(JST)数据库收录期刊

新发传染病电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 49-54.doi: 10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2026.03.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

红细胞分布宽度/白蛋白比值联合干扰素α、肿瘤坏死因子-α对发热伴血小板减少综合征患者预后的预测价值

张雪辰, 方明霞, 江浩, 卢虎   

  1. 南京中医药大学附属南京医院/南京市第二医院急诊医学科,江苏 南京 210003
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-19 出版日期:2026-06-30 发布日期:2026-07-17
  • 通讯作者: 江浩,Email:532797281@qq.com

The predictive value of red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio combined with interferon-α and tumor necrosis factor-α for prognosis in patients with fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome

Zhang Xuechen, Fang Mingxia, Jiang Hao, Lu Hu   

  1. Center of Clinical Laboratory Testing, Nanjing Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing Second Hospital, Jiangsu Nanjing 210003, China
  • Received:2026-02-19 Online:2026-06-30 Published:2026-07-17

摘要: 目的 探讨红细胞分布宽度/白蛋白比值(red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio, RAR)联合干扰素α(interferon-α, IFN-α)与肿瘤坏死因子-α(tumor necrosis factor-α,TNF-α)对发热伴血小板减少综合征(severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome,SFTS)患者不良预后的早期预测价值。方法 采用回顾性队列研究,连续纳入2023年6月至2025年8月南京市第二医院收治的396例SFTS患者,根据28d转归分为治愈组(304例)与预后不良组(92例)。收集患者入院时临床资料及实验室指标(包括RAR、IFN-α、TNF-α等),通过单因素及多因素Logistic回归分析筛选独立危险因素,并采用受试者操作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve,ROC曲线)评估各指标及联合模型的预测效能。结果 预后不良组年龄、RAR、病毒载量、TNF-α、IFN-α、总胆红素(total bilirubin,TBIL)、葡萄糖、尿素氮(blood urea nitrogen,BUN)水平均显著高于治愈组(均P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,上述指标均为SFTS患者不良预后的独立危险因素(均OR>1,均P<0.05)。ROC曲线分析表明,RAR、TNF-α、IFN-α单独预测的曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)分别为0.762、0.582、0.762;三者联合预测的AUC提升至0.864(95%CI:0.832~0.896),敏感度为72.8%,特异度为86.5%,预测性能显著优于单一指标。结论 RAR、IFN-α与TNF-α升高是SFTS患者不良预后的危险因素。三者联合构建的预测模型具有较好的判别能力,可为早期识别高危患者、实施分层干预提供有价值的参考。

关键词: 发热伴血小板减少综合征, 红细胞分布宽度/白蛋白比值, 干扰素α, 肿瘤坏死因子-α, 预后

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the predictive value of the red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio (RAR) combined with interferon-α(IFN-α) and tumor necrosis factor-α(TNF-α) for early identification of poor prognosis in patients with severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome (SFTS). Method A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 396 SFTS patients admitted to Nanjing Second Hospital between June 2023 and August 2025. Based on 28-day outcomes, patients were categorized into a cured group (n=304) and a poor prognosis group (n=92). Clinical data and laboratory parameters (including RAR, IFN-α, and TNF-α) collected at admission were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors. The predictive performance of individual indicators and a combined model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (receiver operator characteristic curve, ROC) curve analysis. Result The poor prognosis group had significantly higher levels of age, RAR, viral load, TNF-α, IFN-α, total bilirubin (TBIL), glucose (GLU), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) compared to the cured group (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed these indicators as independent risk factors for poor prognosis (all P<0.05). ROC analysis showed that the areas under the curve (AUC) for RAR, TNF-α, and IFN-α alone were 0.762, 0.582, and 0.762, respectively. The AUC for the combined model increased to 0.864 (95%CI: 0.832-0.896), with a sensitivity of 72.8% and a specificity of 86.6%, demonstrating superior predictive performance compared to any single indicator. Conclusion RAR, IFN-α, and TNF-α are independent risk factors for poor prognosis in SFTS patients. The combined prediction model incorporating these three indicators shows good discriminative ability and may serve as a valuable tool for the early identification of high-risk patients, facilitating stratified clinical management.

Key words: Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome, Red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio, Interferon-α, Tumor necrosis factor-α, Prognosis

中图分类号: