人民卫生出版社系列期刊
ISSN 2096-2738 CN 11-9370/R

中国科技核心期刊(中国科技论文统计源期刊)
2020《中国学术期刊影响因子年报》统计源期刊
美国化学文摘社(CAS)数据库收录期刊
日本科学技术振兴机构(JST)数据库收录期刊

新发传染病电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3): 206-209.doi: 10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2021.03.009

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

围生期孕妇B族链球菌感染影响因素及产时预防性治疗对妊娠结局的影响分析

唐敏云, 文琼花, 熊冲   

  1. 海南省万宁市人民医院检验科,海南 万宁 571500
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-04 出版日期:2021-08-31 发布日期:2021-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 唐敏云,Email:incentive69@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    海南省自然科学基金资助(8174035)

Analysis of influencing factors of group B hemolytic streptococcus infection in perinatal women and the influence of intrapartum preventive treatment on pregnancy outcome

Tang Minyun, Wen Qionghua, Xiong Chong   

  1. Clinical Laboratory of Wanning People's Hospital, Hainan Wanning 571500, China
  • Received:2021-02-04 Online:2021-08-31 Published:2021-10-11

摘要: 目的 分析围生期孕妇生殖道B族链球菌(group B hemolytic streptococcus,GBS)感染影响因素及产时抗生素预防性治疗(intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis,IAP)对妊娠结局的影响,为优生优育提供理论依据。方法 选取2018年6月至2020年6月在万宁市人民医院建档的妊娠晚期孕妇1850例,根据阴道分泌物GBS检测结果分为GBS阳性组和GBS阴性组,采用Logistic回归分析孕妇生殖道GBS感染影响因素。将GBS阳性者根据产妇意愿分为GBS阳性治疗组和GBS阳性未治疗组,对比三组入选者妊娠结局。结果 ①1850例孕妇中GBS阳性124例,GBS阳性率为6.70%。Logistic回归分析提示流产史、阴道炎、妊娠糖尿病是影响GBS感染的危险因素。②三组孕妇在产后盆腔炎、羊水污染、产后出血间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);GBS阳性未治疗组早产率高于GBS阴性组(P<0.017),三组足月胎膜早破发生率两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.017);三组新生儿出生体质量间比较差异无意义(P>0.05);三组新生儿Apgar评分两两比较差异均有意义(P<0.05);GBS阳性治疗组及GBS阳性未治疗组新生儿感染性肺炎发生率高于GBS阴性组,GBS阳性未治疗组新生儿败血症发生率高于GBS阴性组(P<0.017)。结论 有流产史、阴道炎、妊娠糖尿病是影响围生期孕妇GBS感染的危险因素。IAP可有效改善GBS感染孕妇妊娠结局。

关键词: 妊娠期, B族链球菌, 妊娠结局, 抗生素/预防性治疗

Abstract: Objective To analyze the influencing factors of group B hemolytic streptococcus (GBS) infection in perinatal pregnant women and the effect of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) on pregnancy outcome, so as to provide theoretical basis for eugenics. Methods 1850 pregnant women in late pregnancy who were established in Wanning people's Hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were selected. According to the results of GBS detection of vaginal secretion, they were divided into GBS positive group and GBS negative group. The influencing factors of GBS infection in reproductive tract were analyzed by logistic regression. GBS positive patients were divided into GBS positive treatment group and GBS positive non treatment group according to the wishes of pregnant women.The pregnancy outcomes of the three groups were compared. Results ①Among 1850 pregnant women, 124 were GBS positive, and the positive rate of GBS was 6.70%. Logistic regression analysis showed that abortion history, vaginitis and gestational diabetes mellitus were risk factors for GBS infection. ②There was no significant difference in postpartum pelvic inflammatory disease, amniotic fluid pollution and postpartum hemorrhage among the three groups of pregnant women(P>0.05); The preterm birth rate of GBS positive untreated group was higher than that of GBS negative group (P<0.017). There were significant differences in the incidence of premature rupture of membranes among the three groups (P<0.017). There was no significant difference in birth weight among the three groups (P>0.05); there was significant difference in Apgar score among the three groups (P<0.05); the incidence of neonatal infectious pneumonia in GBS positive treatment group and GBS positive untreated group was higher than that in GBS negative group, and the incidence of neonatal sepsis in GBS positive untreated group was higher than that in GBS negative group (P<0.017). Conclusion The risk factors of GBS infection in pregnant women during perinatal period are abortion history, vaginitis and gestational diabetes. IAP can effectively improve the pregnancy outcome of pregnant women infected with GBS.

Key words: Pregnancy, Group B hemolytic streptococcus, Pregnancy outcome, Antibiotic, prophylactic treatment