People's Health Press
ISSN 2096-2738 CN 11-9370/R

Source Journal for Chinese Scientific and Technical Papers and Citations
Source Journal for Annual Report for Chinese Academic Journal Impact Factors(2022)
Indexed Journals in the Database of the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS), USA
Indexed Journals in the Database of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)

  • Official WeChat

  • Official Weibo

  • Electronic Journal of Emerging Infectious Diseases ›› 2026, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (4): 13-17.doi: 10.19871/j.cnki.xfcrbzz.2026.04.002

    • Original Articles • Previous Articles     Next Articles

    The diagnostic value of Xpert MTB/RIF detection in different types of samples of tuberculosis patients

    Zhang Yaxi1, Li Jing2, Yang Qianting1, Wang Min1, Zhan Senlin2, Chen Qi1   

    1. 1. Institute of Hepatology, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518112, China;
      2. Fourth Department of Lung, Shenzhen Third People's Hospital, Guangdong Shenzhen 518112, China
    • Received:2025-11-26 Online:2026-08-31 Published:2026-09-14

    Abstract: Objective This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the GeneXpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin assay (Xpert MTB/RIF), a real-time fluorescent quantitative nucleic acid amplification test, in different clinical specimens from patients with active tuberculosis (TB), so as to provide evidence for specimen selection in clinical TB diagnosis. Method A retrospective analysis was performed. Clinical data and Xpert MTB/RIF test results of various specimens were collected from patients diagnosed with active TB at the Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen between January and December 2023. The positive detection rates across specimen types were statistically compared. Paired samples of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) versus sputum, and tissue versus pus were analyzed for detection rate differences. The prevalence of rifampicin resistance was also compared between patients with newly treated TB and retreated TB. Result A total of 1,443 specimens were enrolled. The overall positive detection rate of Xpert MTB/RIF was 69.02% (996/1443). The positive rates of different specimens sorted in descending order were as follows: pus 89.11% (221/248), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid 84.50% (169/200), sputum 74.74% (361/483), tissue 71.42% (100/140), urine 56.96% (45/79), stool 42.86% (42/98), cerebrospinal fluid 34.14% (28/82), and pleural effusion 26.55% (30/113). Paired analysis for pulmonary TB patients revealed that the detection rate of BALF (87.90%, 109/124) was significantly higher than that of sputum (67.74%, 84/124), with a statistically significant difference (χ2=18.939,P<0.001). For extrapulmonary TB patients, the detection rate of pus (86.76%, 59/68) was markedly higher than that of tissue specimens (64.71%, 44/68) (χ2=9.000, P=0.002). Rifampicin resistance testing showed an overall resistance rate of 8.59% (124/1443), including a resistance rate of 2.84% in newly treated TB patients and 5.75% in retreated TB patients. Conclusion Xpert MTB/RIF assay features rapid detection, simple operation, high specificity, and the capability to identify rifampicin resistance. However, its diagnostic yield varies substantially by specimen type. Targeted selection of clinical specimens can effectively improve the etiological diagnostic accuracy of tuberculosis.

    Key words: Xpert MTB/RIF, Tuberculosis, Molecular diagnosis, Rifampicin resistance, Diagnostic efficiency, Paired detection

    CLC Number: